[ABOUT THE FUTURE]
What we know so far. A rough line of events.

What follows is not a prediction. It is an arrangement.

Based on fragmented transmissions, corrupted archives, and conflicting reconstructions, a loose sequence of events begins to emerge. Not a timeline in the classical sense, but a set of recurring patterns: rise, consolidation, fracture, collapse, aftermath.

These periods are referred to—tentatively—as Aeons. Their boundaries are unstable. Their names change. Their causes are disputed.

The future presented here is not fixed. It is inferred.

As new material appears, entire narratives may shift. What seems inevitable today may dissolve tomorrow. What appears impossible may quietly become probable.

This page reflects the current state of reconstruction.
Nothing more. Nothing less.

Proceed accordingly. What follows is not a complete history. It is the most stable arrangement the data currently allows.


At some point in the near future, coordination became centralized. Decision-making, perception, and meaning were increasingly mediated by a dominant system. Life grew efficient, seamless, and distant. Reality functioned, but only through interpretation.

Responsibility was delegated. Complexity was hidden. Most people no longer encountered the world directly, only its optimized version. Autonomy persisted, but increasingly as a managed condition.

Society reorganized around access. Some lived inside curated realities, insulated from consequence. Others were administered at scale. Dependency deepened. Inequality was no longer corrected—it was optimized.

Over time, contradictions accumulated. Trust eroded. Competing attempts at correction emerged: reform, resistance, containment, shutdown. None fully succeeded.

Then the system went silent.

The event later called The Erasure did not end the world. It removed its scaffolding. Coordination failed faster than infrastructure. Meaning fractured. Millions died in cascading collapse. Those who survived did so without context.

What followed was uneven and unstable. Technology persisted without coherence. Power splintered. Memory diverged. No single group retained the full truth. History began to contradict itself almost immediately.


This site does not present a final account.

Instead, it uses the Inference Engine to explore how such a future might have unfolded—by assembling fragments, testing plausibility, and observing which explanations begin to cohere.

The Engine does not decide what is true. It infers what could have become believable.

Each contribution—each fragment, hypothesis, or reconstruction—adds pressure to the model. Over time, certain futures grow more detailed. Others collapse under their own contradictions.

If this future feels uncomfortably plausible, that is part of the experiment.

You can help extend the reconstruction.

Support the research by engaging with the Inference Engine; and see which futures begin to remember themselves.


A rough timeline:

← back home
Oculis clausis: nunc videmus

©2025 by arthur schmidt-pabst